[Bug bootstrap/17249] New: [java-gui-branch] Bootstrap failure on alpha-linux

[Bug bootstrap/17249] New: [java-gui-branch] Bootstrap failure on alpha-linux

[falk at debian dot org]

Hi,

configure --enable-languages=java --enable-java-gc=boehm --enable-java-awt=gtk
[...]
/src/gcc-java-gui-branch-2004.08.31/build/gcc/xgcc
-B/src/gcc-java-gui-branch-2004.08.31/build/gcc/
-B/usr/local/alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/
-B/usr/local/alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/ -isystem
/usr/local/alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu/include -isystem
/usr/local/alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu/sys-include -DPACKAGE_NAME=\"\"
-DPACKAGE_TARNAME=\"\" -DPACKAGE_VERSION=\"\" -DPACKAGE_STRING=\"\"
-DPACKAGE_BUGREPORT=\"\" -DGC_LINUX_THREADS=1 -D_REENTRANT=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1
-DHAVE_SYS_TYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_STAT_H=1 -DHAVE_STDLIB_H=1 -DHAVE_STRING_H=1
-DHAVE_MEMORY_H=1 -DHAVE_STRINGS_H=1 -DHAVE_INTTYPES_H=1 -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1
-DHAVE_UNISTD_H=1 -DSILENT=1 -DNO_SIGNALS=1 -DALL_INTERIOR_POINTERS=1
-DJAVA_FINALIZATION=1 -DGC_GCJ_SUPPORT=1 -DATOMIC_UNCOLLECTABLE=1
-I/src/gcc-java-gui-branch-2004.08.31/boehm-gc/include -O2 -g -O2 -mieee
-fexceptions -I././targ-include -I.//libc/include -O2 -g -O2 -mieee -fexceptions
-I././targ-include -I.//libc/include -c ../../../boehm-gc/darwin_stop_world.c -o
darwin_stop_world.o >/dev/null 2>&1
make[3]: *** No rule to make target `alpha_mach_dep.lo', needed by
`libgcjgc.la'.  Stop.
make[3]: Leaving directory
`/src/gcc-java-gui-branch-2004.08.31/build/alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu/boehm-gc'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/src/gcc-java-gui-branch-2004.08.31/build/alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu/boehm-gc'
make[1]: *** [all-target-boehm-gc] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/src/gcc-java-gui-branch-2004.08.31/build'
make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2

-- 
           Summary: [java-gui-branch] Bootstrap failure on alpha-linux
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: bootstrap
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: falk at debian dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17249

[Bug bootstrap/17249] [java-gui-branch] Bootstrap failure on alpha-linux

[fitzsim at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com  2004-08-31 15:32 -------
Can you try applying these patches and rebuilding?

http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/boehm-gc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.191&r2=1.192
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/boehm-gc/Makefile.am.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.41&r2=1.42
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/boehm-gc/Makefile.in.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.48&r2=1.49

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |fitzsim at redhat dot com
                   |dot org                     |
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |ASSIGNED
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-08-31 15:32:03
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17249

[Bug bootstrap/17249] [java-gui-branch] Bootstrap failure on alpha-linux

[fitzsim at redhat dot com]

------- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com  2004-08-31 21:44 -------
I take it PR 17254 means we can close this one (after I've committed these
patches to java-gui-branch)?


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |WAITING


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17249

[Bug bootstrap/17249] [java-gui-branch] Bootstrap failure on alpha-linux

[falk at debian dot org]

------- Additional Comments From falk at debian dot org  2004-08-31 21:59 -------
Yes, absolutely. I though I'd appended a note here, but apparently it got lost
somehow.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|WAITING                     |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17249