From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11119 invoked by alias); 31 Aug 2004 16:12:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11111 invoked by uid 48); 31 Aug 2004 16:12:59 -0000 Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040831161259.11110.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040824155045.17170.terra@gnome.org> References: <20040824155045.17170.terra@gnome.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/17170] -Wdefault-bitfield-sign X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-08/txt/msg03280.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-31 16:12 ------- Again there is no reason to warn about the signness if we already document about it as required by the C standard :) Also since we do warn about :1 were all the problems are, I am going to close this. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution| |INVALID http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17170