From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-109084-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 23046 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2004 14:56:04 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 23033 invoked from network); 3 Sep 2004 14:56:03 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO thales.mathematik.uni-ulm.de) (134.60.66.5)
  by sourceware.org with SMTP; 3 Sep 2004 14:56:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 9037 invoked by uid 642); 3 Sep 2004 14:56:03 -0000
Message-ID: <20040903145603.9036.qmail@thales.mathematik.uni-ulm.de>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 14:56:00 -0000
From: Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@mathematik.uni-ulm.de>
To: ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Cc: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Bug rtl-optimization/17027] [3.4 Regression] ICE with noreturn function in loop at -O2
References: <20040814151417.17027.sfc@village.uunet.be> <20040903144556.16595.qmail@sourceware.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040903144556.16595.qmail@sourceware.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00310.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 02:45:56PM -0000, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> Note that I don't need to specify -mcpu to get the SIGSEGV.

Indeed. The original testcase (first attachment) does require -mcpu=v9
to trigger the ICE here whereas the simplified version (comment #4) doesn't.

    regards  Christian