From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23404 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2004 14:56:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23394 invoked by alias); 3 Sep 2004 14:56:11 -0000 Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 14:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040903145611.23390.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040814151417.17027.sfc@village.uunet.be> References: <20040814151417.17027.sfc@village.uunet.be> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/17027] [3.4 Regression] ICE with noreturn function in loop at -O2 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00311.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From ehrhardt at mathematik dot uni-ulm dot de 2004-09-03 14:56 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] ICE with noreturn function in loop at -O2 On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 02:45:56PM -0000, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > Note that I don't need to specify -mcpu to get the SIGSEGV. Indeed. The original testcase (first attachment) does require -mcpu=v9 to trigger the ICE here whereas the simplified version (comment #4) doesn't. regards Christian -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17027