public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "cludwig at cdc dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/17232] classes and class template specializations treated differently w.r.t. core issue #337
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 07:03:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040906070345.31947.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040829175551.17232.cludwig@cdc.informatik.tu-darmstadt.de>


------- Additional Comments From cludwig at cdc dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de  2004-09-06 07:03 -------
Subject: Re:  classes and class template specializations treated differently w.r.t. core issue #337

On Mon, Aug 30, 2004 at 11:15:33PM -0000, giovannibajo at libero dot it wrote:
> I think the submitter was going to raise the issue on comp.std.c++, but maybe
> you can raise this directly with the committee? When we get a consensus, I can
> test & submit the patch I attacched to this bug.

My post to comp.std.c++ drew only one reply; but in this reply Gabriel
Dos Reis confirmed that my understanding of 14.7.1 is correct and this
is indeed a bug in gcc. See
<URL:http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&selm=m3656v637d.fsf%40merlin.cs.tamu.edu>.

Regards

Christoph


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17232


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-09-06  7:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-29 17:55 [Bug c++/17232] New: " cludwig at cdc dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de
2004-08-29 17:58 ` [Bug c++/17232] " cludwig at cdc dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de
2004-08-29 18:42 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-08-29 18:57 ` cludwig at cdc dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de
2004-08-30 12:30 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-08-30 13:22 ` cludwig at cdc dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de
2004-08-30 14:47 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-08-30 16:05 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-08-30 16:56 ` cludwig at cdc dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de
2004-08-30 20:10 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-08-30 20:56 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-08-30 22:12 ` jason at redhat dot com
2004-08-30 23:15 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-09-06  7:03 ` cludwig at cdc dot informatik dot tu-darmstadt dot de [this message]
2004-09-06 13:40 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-09-06 13:43 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-09-27 12:02 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
     [not found] <bug-17232-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2013-02-27 18:03 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-03-17  2:37 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-03-17 20:32 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-03-23 17:08 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-09  1:30 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-04-22 11:37 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-07-16 13:31 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040906070345.31947.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).