From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6036 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2004 14:32:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 6022 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2004 14:32:56 -0000 Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 14:32:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040907143256.6021.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "kgardas at objectsecurity dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040904072757.17315.kgardas@objectsecurity.com> References: <20040904072757.17315.kgardas@objectsecurity.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/17315] Strange compile-time regression in cpp against gcc3.4.1 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00561.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From kgardas at objectsecurity dot com 2004-09-07 14:32 ------- Subject: Re: Strange compile-time regression in cpp against gcc3.4.1 Paolo, I would just like to ask if you are really sure that this is preprocessor related and so changing component from libstdc++ to preprocessor is right, especially when I simply preprocess files by -E and measure the same time spent by 3.4.1 and 3.5.0 preprocessors... (0.26 second spent by 3.4.1 and 0.27 spent by 3.5.0) Thanks, Karel -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17315