From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23924 invoked by alias); 7 Sep 2004 22:41:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23917 invoked by uid 48); 7 Sep 2004 22:41:24 -0000 Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 22:41:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040907224124.23916.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "bangerth at dealii dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030318174600.10138.h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> References: <20030318174600.10138.h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/10138] -Wuninitialized could catch uninitialized arrays X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00612.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bangerth at dealii dot org 2004-09-07 22:41 ------- I disagree -- the question whether an argument is actually used or not is secondary, the fact that we pass an uninitialized variable to which only read access is possible is definitely worth a warning. W. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10138