From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17456 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2004 05:37:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17447 invoked by uid 48); 8 Sep 2004 05:37:29 -0000 Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 05:37:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040908053729.17446.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040904072757.17315.kgardas@objectsecurity.com> References: <20040904072757.17315.kgardas@objectsecurity.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/17315] Strange compile-time regression in cpp against gcc3.4.1 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00629.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-08 05:37 ------- I should also note the numbers come with repsect with 3.5.0 preprocessed source and 3.4.0 preprocessed source on both compilers so we see that 3.5.0 is faster on both preprocessed source so even the C++ front-end is slower. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17315