From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15431 invoked by alias); 8 Sep 2004 17:50:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 15415 invoked by uid 48); 8 Sep 2004 17:50:29 -0000 Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 17:50:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040908175029.15414.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040816152907.17050.coyote@coyotegulch.com> References: <20040816152907.17050.coyote@coyotegulch.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/17050] [3.5 Regression] Performance pessimisation as compared to GCC 3.4 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00658.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-08 17:50 ------- Can you try again as IV-OPT should have improved the preformance? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17050