From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 23595 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2004 19:07:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 23576 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2004 19:07:06 -0000 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 19:07:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040910190706.23575.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rth at redhat dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040709202544.16460.drepper@redhat.com> References: <20040709202544.16460.drepper@redhat.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/16460] [3.5 Regression] ICE when compiling glibc (ld-ctype.c) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg00998.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rth at redhat dot com 2004-09-10 19:07 ------- Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] ICE when compiling glibc (ld-ctype.c) On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 12:34:10PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote: > Richard, does this seem sane? I probably should do that in > unnest_function_tree so it is done at the time unnesting really happens > instead of waiting for the end of compilation. I will do this change > before putting in the patch if this approach looks sane to you. I think I would prefer that. Provide a function in cgraph*.c to perform the cgraph_node manipulation, and call that from the end of tree-nested.c. r~ -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16460