From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17074 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2004 23:59:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 17056 invoked by alias); 10 Sep 2004 23:59:08 -0000 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 23:59:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040910235908.17055.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "jh at suse dot cz" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040709202544.16460.drepper@redhat.com> References: <20040709202544.16460.drepper@redhat.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/16460] [3.5 Regression] ICE when compiling glibc (ld-ctype.c) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg01044.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From jh at suse dot cz 2004-09-10 23:59 ------- Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] ICE when compiling glibc (ld-ctype.c) > > ------- Additional Comments From rth at redhat dot com 2004-09-10 19:07 ------- > Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] ICE when compiling glibc (ld-ctype.c) > > On Fri, Sep 10, 2004 at 12:34:10PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote: > > Richard, does this seem sane? I probably should do that in > > unnest_function_tree so it is done at the time unnesting really happens > > instead of waiting for the end of compilation. I will do this change > > before putting in the patch if this approach looks sane to you. > > I think I would prefer that. Provide a function in cgraph*.c to > perform the cgraph_node manipulation, and call that from the end > of tree-nested.c. Yeah, sure, I didn't intend to commit the patch in the current form, I just got short of time and I was unsure if you don't have different approach in mind. I will create updated version, thanks. Honza > > > r~ > > > -- > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16460 > > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16460