From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8886 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2004 06:23:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8858 invoked by uid 48); 14 Sep 2004 06:23:38 -0000 Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 06:23:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040914062338.8856.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040912151302.17437.steven@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040912151302.17437.steven@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug other/17437] [4.0 Regression] obscure GC problem X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg01498.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-14 06:23 ------- Jeff, the bug you described in your main at is exactly like what I've observed. I couldn't find any place where we fail do free_df, but I haven't looked very closely at it yet. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |law at redhat dot com Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-09-14 06:23:35 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17437