From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20088 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2004 15:11:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20052 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2004 15:11:34 -0000 Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040914151134.20051.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20030424121601.10479.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> References: <20030424121601.10479.rguenth@tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/10479] __alignof__(double) not compile time constant inside template class X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg01548.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From rguenth at tat dot physik dot uni-tuebingen dot de 2004-09-14 15:11 ------- Subject: Re: __alignof__(double) not compile time constant inside template class On 14 Sep 2004, gdr at integrable-solutions dot net wrote: > I know "double" is not dependent type. Did you doubt that? No, I thought you maybe missed it. I thought so because I cannot see the difference between the templated and non-templated variant - of course just because of my ignorance. > Do you believe I'm against making this work? I find it very annoying, > and happen to qualify as plain stupid. I was just explaining what was > going on. Ok thanks, I'll guess target-milestone would be 4.1 earliest then. > Some time ago, I tried to fix that but it blew up. It may probably be > not difficult, but it you don't try you probably won't figure it out. Of course. Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10479