From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20263 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2004 13:28:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 20256 invoked by uid 48); 18 Sep 2004 13:28:12 -0000 Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 13:28:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040918132812.20255.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040917173112.17535.sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20040917173112.17535.sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/17535] Regression in gfortran with module procedures X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg02097.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-18 13:28 ------- Confirmed. I somehow messed up my CVS tree when trying to back out the patch Steve is pointing to, so I can't tell for sure if that's the culprit. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-09-18 13:28:09 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17535