public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug tree-optimization/17563] New: [4.0.0 Regression] verify_ssa failed
@ 2004-09-19 20:50 mueller at kde dot org
  2004-09-19 21:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/17563] [4.0 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: mueller at kde dot org @ 2004-09-19 20:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

testcase:  
 
=== cut === 
extern int nx; 
extern int ny; 
 
void breakme() 
{ 
    int* bins[ny][nx]; 
    for ( int i = 0; i < ny ; i++ ) { 
        for ( int j = 0; j < nx; j++ ) 
            bins[i][j] = 0L; 
    } 
} 
=== Cut === 
 error: Definition in block 1 does not dominate use in block 11 
for SSA_NAME: D.1123_44 
in statement: 
ivtmp.18D.1155_39 = &(*bins.2D.1113_32)[iD.1096_1]{lb: 0 sz: D.1123_44 * 4}[0]; 
test.cc:5: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed. 
Please submit a full bug report, 
with preprocessed source if appropriate. 
See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.

-- 
           Summary: [4.0.0 Regression] verify_ssa failed
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.0.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: tree-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: mueller at kde dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
 GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
  GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17563


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/17563] [4.0 Regression] verify_ssa failed
  2004-09-19 20:50 [Bug tree-optimization/17563] New: [4.0.0 Regression] verify_ssa failed mueller at kde dot org
@ 2004-09-19 21:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-09-20  8:58 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-19 21:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-09-19 21:19 -------
Here is something slightly smaller:
void breakme(int ny, int nx)
{
    int* bins[ny][nx], i, j;
    for ( i = 0; i < ny ; i++ ) {
        for ( j = 0; j < nx; j++ )
            bins[i][j] = 0L;
    }
}
And there is alread a patch

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |rakdver at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
           Keywords|                            |ice-on-valid-code, patch
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-09-19 21:19:26
               date|                            |
            Summary|[4.0.0 Regression]          |[4.0 Regression] verify_ssa
                   |verify_ssa failed           |failed
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.0.0


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17563


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/17563] [4.0 Regression] verify_ssa failed
  2004-09-19 20:50 [Bug tree-optimization/17563] New: [4.0.0 Regression] verify_ssa failed mueller at kde dot org
  2004-09-19 21:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/17563] [4.0 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-20  8:58 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-09-27 12:25 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-10-03 17:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-20  8:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-09-20 08:58 -------
Here's a testcase with only one loop:

==============================
void foo(int n)
{
    int a[1][n], i;
    for ( i=0; i<2; i++ )
        a[0][i] = 0;
}
==============================


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org
           Severity|normal                      |critical
           Keywords|                            |monitored


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17563


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/17563] [4.0 Regression] verify_ssa failed
  2004-09-19 20:50 [Bug tree-optimization/17563] New: [4.0.0 Regression] verify_ssa failed mueller at kde dot org
  2004-09-19 21:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/17563] [4.0 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-09-20  8:58 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-27 12:25 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-10-03 17:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-27 12:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-09-27 12:25 -------
Fixed by Zdenek's patch for PR 17591:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-09/msg01225.html

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17563


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [Bug tree-optimization/17563] [4.0 Regression] verify_ssa failed
  2004-09-19 20:50 [Bug tree-optimization/17563] New: [4.0.0 Regression] verify_ssa failed mueller at kde dot org
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-09-27 12:25 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-03 17:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-03 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
Bug 17563 depends on bug 17399, which changed state.

Bug 17399 Summary: [4.0 Regression] Ada does not bootstrap
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17399

           What    |Old Value                   |New Value
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17563


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2004-10-03 17:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-09-19 20:50 [Bug tree-optimization/17563] New: [4.0.0 Regression] verify_ssa failed mueller at kde dot org
2004-09-19 21:19 ` [Bug tree-optimization/17563] [4.0 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-20  8:58 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-27 12:25 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-03 17:53 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).