public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/17578] New: Missed optimization--failure of gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/compare-fp-3.c at -O1 and above Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 01:56:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20040921015638.17578.danglin@gcc.gnu.org> (raw) FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/compare-fp-3.c compilation, -O1 UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/compare-fp-3.c execution, -O1 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/compare-fp-3.c compilation, -O2 UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/compare-fp-3.c execution, -O2 FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/compare-fp-3.c compilation, -O3 -fomit-frame- pointer UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/compare-fp-3.c execution, -O3 -fomit- frame-pointer FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/compare-fp-3.c compilation, -O3 -g UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/compare-fp-3.c execution, -O3 -g FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/compare-fp-3.c compilation, -Os UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/compare-fp-3.c execution, -Os /tmp/ccKC9FUM.o(.text+0x30): In function `test1': : undefined reference to `link_error0' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status The failures first appeared with the following change: 2004-09-02 James E Wilson <wilson@specifixinc.com> * common.opt (ftrapping-math): Default to on. The tests don't fail with -fno-trapping-math. This is the function that doesn't optimize: void test1 (float x, float y) { if ((x==y) && (x!=y)) link_error0(); } It is the only pair of comparisons in this test that isn't correctly optimized. The others are correctly optimized prior to the initial RTL generation. The generated code for this function is ok. It's just not optimized. As far as I can tell, neither comparison should trap, so -ftrapping-math shouldn't affect the optimization. This is the generated code at -O1. .text .align 4 .globl test1 .type test1, @function test1: .PROC .CALLINFO FRAME=64,CALLS,SAVE_RP .ENTRY stw %r2,-20(%r30) fcmp,sgl,!= %fr4L,%fr5L ftest b .L4 ldo 64(%r30),%r30 b .L7 ldw -84(%r30),%r2 .L4: fcmp,sgl,= %fr4L,%fr5L ftest b .L6 ldw -84(%r30),%r2 b,n .L7 .L6: bl link_error0,%r2 nop ldw -84(%r30),%r2 .L7: bv %r0(%r2) ldo -64(%r30),%r30 .EXIT .PROCEND .size test1, .-test1 This doesn't appear to be a regression as 3.4 doesn't optimize this function either. I've added Roger and Paolo to the cc list as they worked on this optimization. -- Summary: Missed optimization--failure of gcc.c- torture/execute/ieee/compare-fp-3.c at -O1 and above Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: bonzini at gnu dot org,gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,roger at eyesopen dot com GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17578
next reply other threads:[~2004-09-21 1:56 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2004-09-21 1:56 danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2004-09-21 4:33 ` [Bug tree-optimization/17578] " danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-21 4:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-21 6:20 ` dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca 2004-09-23 3:18 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-23 2:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-26 20:49 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-26 21:00 ` danglin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07 14:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-15 5:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20040921015638.17578.danglin@gcc.gnu.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).