* [Bug middle-end/17128] ICE in tree-inline
2004-08-21 0:43 [Bug middle-end/17128] New: ICE in tree-line bommar33 at msu dot edu
@ 2004-08-21 0:43 ` bommar33 at msu dot edu
2004-08-21 0:46 ` bommar33 at msu dot edu
` (11 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: bommar33 at msu dot edu @ 2004-08-21 0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary|ICE in tree-line |ICE in tree-inline
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17128
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/17128] ICE in tree-inline
2004-08-21 0:43 [Bug middle-end/17128] New: ICE in tree-line bommar33 at msu dot edu
2004-08-21 0:43 ` [Bug middle-end/17128] ICE in tree-inline bommar33 at msu dot edu
@ 2004-08-21 0:46 ` bommar33 at msu dot edu
2004-08-21 1:48 ` [Bug middle-end/17128] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: bommar33 at msu dot edu @ 2004-08-21 0:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bommar33 at msu dot edu 2004-08-21 00:46 -------
Created an attachment (id=6969)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6969&action=view)
Bzip2'ed preprocessed source
$]gcc -c -O1 charset.i
charset.c: In function `convert_utf8_utf16':
charset.c:471: internal compiler error: in expand_call_inline, at
tree-inline.c:1484
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17128
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/17128] [3.5 Regression] ICE in tree-inline
2004-08-21 0:43 [Bug middle-end/17128] New: ICE in tree-line bommar33 at msu dot edu
2004-08-21 0:43 ` [Bug middle-end/17128] ICE in tree-inline bommar33 at msu dot edu
2004-08-21 0:46 ` bommar33 at msu dot edu
@ 2004-08-21 1:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-21 1:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-21 1:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-21 01:48 -------
Confirmed, reduced to:
static __inline__ int
one_utf8_to_utf16 () { }
static __inline__ unsigned char
conversion_loop (int (*const one_conversion)())
{
return one_conversion ();
}
static unsigned char
convert_utf8_utf16 ()
{
return conversion_loop (one_utf8_to_utf16);
}
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Severity|normal |critical
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-08-21 01:48:31
date| |
Summary|ICE in tree-inline |[3.5 Regression] ICE in
| |tree-inline
Target Milestone|--- |3.5.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17128
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/17128] [3.5 Regression] ICE in tree-inline
2004-08-21 0:43 [Bug middle-end/17128] New: ICE in tree-line bommar33 at msu dot edu
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-21 1:48 ` [Bug middle-end/17128] [3.5 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-21 1:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-21 2:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-21 1:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-21 01:49 -------
: Search converges between 2004-04-01-trunk (#447) and 2004-04-10-trunk (#448).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17128
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/17128] [3.5 Regression] ICE in tree-inline
2004-08-21 0:43 [Bug middle-end/17128] New: ICE in tree-line bommar33 at msu dot edu
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-21 1:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-21 2:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-23 10:15 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-21 2:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-21 02:02 -------
I think it was caused by this change:
2004-04-02 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
* cgraph.c: Add overall comment.
(cgraph_inline_hash): New global variable.
(cgraph_create_node): Break out from ...
(cgraph_node): ... here.
(cgraph_edge): New function.
.....
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jh at suse dot cz
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17128
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/17128] [3.5 Regression] ICE in tree-inline
2004-08-21 0:43 [Bug middle-end/17128] New: ICE in tree-line bommar33 at msu dot edu
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-21 2:02 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-23 10:15 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-09 6:59 ` aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-23 10:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-08-23 10:15 -------
Anrew's guess was right. The bug appears with Jan's patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2004-04/msg00137.html
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot
| |org
Keywords| |monitored
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17128
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/17128] [3.5 Regression] ICE in tree-inline
2004-08-21 0:43 [Bug middle-end/17128] New: ICE in tree-line bommar33 at msu dot edu
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2004-08-23 10:15 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-09 6:59 ` aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-09 9:06 ` jh at suse dot cz
` (5 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: aj at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-09 6:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From aj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-09 06:59 -------
This looks like a duplicate of 16460.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |aj at suse dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17128
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/17128] [3.5 Regression] ICE in tree-inline
2004-08-21 0:43 [Bug middle-end/17128] New: ICE in tree-line bommar33 at msu dot edu
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-09 6:59 ` aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-09 9:06 ` jh at suse dot cz
2004-09-09 9:16 ` aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jh at suse dot cz @ 2004-09-09 9:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jh at suse dot cz 2004-09-09 09:06 -------
Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] ICE in tree-inline
static __inline__ int
one_utf8_to_utf16 () { }
static __inline__ unsigned char
conversion_loop (int (*const one_conversion)())
{
return one_conversion ();
}
static unsigned char
convert_utf8_utf16 ()
{
return conversion_loop (one_utf8_to_utf16);
}
2004-09-09 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
middle-end/17128
* tree-inline.c (expand_call_inline): Make overactive sanity check happy.
Index: tree-inline.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/tree-inline.c,v
retrieving revision 1.137
diff -c -3 -p -r1.137 tree-inline.c
*** tree-inline.c 5 Sep 2004 16:05:00 -0000 1.137
--- tree-inline.c 9 Sep 2004 09:02:47 -0000
*************** expand_call_inline (tree *tp, int *walk_
*** 1481,1487 ****
where previous inlining turned indirect call into direct call by
constant propagating arguments. In all other cases we hit a bug
(incorrect node sharing is most common reason for missing edges. */
! if (!dest->needed)
abort ();
cgraph_create_edge (id->node, dest, t)->inline_failed
= N_("originally indirect function call not considered for inlining");
--- 1481,1487 ----
where previous inlining turned indirect call into direct call by
constant propagating arguments. In all other cases we hit a bug
(incorrect node sharing is most common reason for missing edges. */
! if (!dest->needed && flag_unit_at_a_time)
abort ();
cgraph_create_edge (id->node, dest, t)->inline_failed
= N_("originally indirect function call not considered for inlining");
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17128
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/17128] [3.5 Regression] ICE in tree-inline
2004-08-21 0:43 [Bug middle-end/17128] New: ICE in tree-line bommar33 at msu dot edu
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-09 9:06 ` jh at suse dot cz
@ 2004-09-09 9:16 ` aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-09 9:21 ` jh at suse dot cz
` (3 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: aj at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-09 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From aj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-09 09:16 -------
The code has changed, I guess you need now:
gcc_assert (dest->needed || !flag_unit_at_a_time);
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17128
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/17128] [3.5 Regression] ICE in tree-inline
2004-08-21 0:43 [Bug middle-end/17128] New: ICE in tree-line bommar33 at msu dot edu
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-09 9:16 ` aj at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-09 9:21 ` jh at suse dot cz
2004-09-09 13:43 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: jh at suse dot cz @ 2004-09-09 9:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From jh at suse dot cz 2004-09-09 09:21 -------
Subject: Re: [3.5 Regression] ICE in tree-inline
>
> ------- Additional Comments From aj at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-09 09:16 -------
>
> The code has changed, I guess you need now:
>
> gcc_assert (dest->needed || !flag_unit_at_a_time);
>
Sure, I will update the patch before commiting, thanks!
Honza
>
> --
>
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17128
>
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17128
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/17128] [3.5 Regression] ICE in tree-inline
2004-08-21 0:43 [Bug middle-end/17128] New: ICE in tree-line bommar33 at msu dot edu
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-09 9:21 ` jh at suse dot cz
@ 2004-09-09 13:43 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-22 10:43 ` [Bug middle-end/17128] [4.0 " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-25 11:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-09 13:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-09 13:43 -------
Fixed by my patch
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17128
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/17128] [4.0 Regression] ICE in tree-inline
2004-08-21 0:43 [Bug middle-end/17128] New: ICE in tree-line bommar33 at msu dot edu
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-09 13:43 ` hubicka at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-22 10:43 ` reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-25 11:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-22 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-22 10:43 -------
The example in comment #2 still crashes.
Jan, it looks like your patch was broken. Line 1476 in tree-inline.c now reads
gcc_assert (dest->needed || flag_unit_at_a_time);
but Andreas suggested in comment #8
gcc_assert (dest->needed || !flag_unit_at_a_time);
Could you please have a look?
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17128
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread* [Bug middle-end/17128] [4.0 Regression] ICE in tree-inline
2004-08-21 0:43 [Bug middle-end/17128] New: ICE in tree-line bommar33 at msu dot edu
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2004-09-22 10:43 ` [Bug middle-end/17128] [4.0 " reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-25 11:06 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
12 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-25 11:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-25 11:06 -------
This time fixed for sure.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17128
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread