From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8793 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2004 21:18:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 8760 invoked by uid 48); 22 Sep 2004 21:18:22 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040922211822.8759.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040922143248.17610.chappich@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> References: <20040922143248.17610.chappich@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/17610] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Empty #include statement halts gcc X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg02619.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-22 21:18 ------- Confirmed, but I really would like a preprocessor person to say if this is expected behavior. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-09-22 21:18:20 date| | Summary|Empty #include statement |[3.4/4.0 Regression] Empty |halts gcc |#include statement halts gcc Target Milestone|--- |3.4.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17610