From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13138 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2004 21:56:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 13130 invoked by alias); 22 Sep 2004 21:56:41 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:56:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040922215641.13129.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040922143248.17610.chappich@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> References: <20040922143248.17610.chappich@techfak.uni-bielefeld.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug preprocessor/17610] [3.4/4.0 Regression] Empty #include statement halts gcc X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg02635.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2004-09-22 21:56 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 Regression] Empty #include statement halts gcc pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:- > > ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-22 21:18 ------- > Confirmed, but I really would like a preprocessor person to say if this is expected behavior. Nope, it should be rejected outright like prior versions of GCC did. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17610