From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-111813-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10309 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2004 18:52:25 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10301 invoked by uid 48); 24 Sep 2004 18:52:22 -0000
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:52:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20040924185222.10300.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "boris at kolpackov dot net" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20040923222323.17644.boris@kolpackov.net>
References: <20040923222323.17644.boris@kolpackov.net>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/17644] unexpected symbol redefinition error
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg03039.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From boris at kolpackov dot net  2004-09-24 18:52 -------
And what about this:

class foo
{
};

struct bar
{
  ::foo
  foo ();
};

illegal too?

And this

struct bar
{
  struct foo
  {
  };

  foo
  foo ();
};

should definitely be illegal, right?



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17644