public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c/7860] few new suggested warnings
       [not found] <20020908150600.7860.jhi@iki.fi>
@ 2004-02-08  6:05 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-04-27  4:44 ` [Bug c/7860] few new suggested warnings (for C89) pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-02-08  6:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-02-08 06:04 -------
Note 7654 is the bug for your -Wenum-implicit-int option.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
  BugsThisDependsOn|                            |7654
   Last reconfirmed|2003-11-09 20:16:16         |2004-02-08 06:04:58
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7860


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/7860] few new suggested warnings (for C89)
       [not found] <20020908150600.7860.jhi@iki.fi>
  2004-02-08  6:05 ` [Bug c/7860] few new suggested warnings pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-04-27  4:44 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-07-27  2:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-09-24 19:20 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-04-27  4:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-04-27 03:56 -------
The only warnings that are left (besides the one in PR 7654) are:
-Wcppcomment
-Wenum-trailing-comma

But are effect C89/C90 mode as both of what is being warned about are valid C99.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2004-02-08 06:04:58         |2004-04-27 03:56:35
               date|                            |
            Summary|few new suggested warnings  |few new suggested warnings
                   |                            |(for C89)


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7860


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/7860] few new suggested warnings (for C89)
       [not found] <20020908150600.7860.jhi@iki.fi>
  2004-02-08  6:05 ` [Bug c/7860] few new suggested warnings pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-04-27  4:44 ` [Bug c/7860] few new suggested warnings (for C89) pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-07-27  2:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-09-24 19:20 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-07-27  2:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-07-27 02:58 -------
 -Wpointer-implicit-sign
          Warn if a pointer is implicitly cast between signed
          and unsigned, for example:
              int foo(unsigned char *s) {
                  ...
              }
                  ...
                  char *s;
                  ...
                  foo(s);
          (enabled by -ansi)
This is turned on always now.



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2004-04-27 03:56:35         |2004-07-27 02:58:40
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7860


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/7860] few new suggested warnings (for C89)
       [not found] <20020908150600.7860.jhi@iki.fi>
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-07-27  2:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-09-24 19:20 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-24 19:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-09-24 19:20 -------
All warnings listed either are now on by default, are included in an
existing option such as -pedantic, or are covered by another bug report
such as 7654.

That there should be finer-grained control of which warnings are enabled
(which might include e.g. separate controls for the various warnings
in -pedantic) is generally agreed, but no-one has produced a generally
acceptable design and still had time left to implement it.  The bug
tracking the desire for such control is bug 9049.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |FIXED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7860


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-24 19:20 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <20020908150600.7860.jhi@iki.fi>
2004-02-08  6:05 ` [Bug c/7860] few new suggested warnings pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-04-27  4:44 ` [Bug c/7860] few new suggested warnings (for C89) pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-07-27  2:58 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-24 19:20 ` jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).