public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug driver/12951] New: -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized
@ 2003-11-07 21:45 gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-08 8:17 ` [Bug c/12951] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (4 more replies)
0 siblings, 5 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-07 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12951
Summary: -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized
Product: gcc
Version: 3.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: driver
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
GCC host triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
GCC target triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
Although the claim is that all -W<warn> options also accept the -Wno-<warn>
form, this is not true for -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration.
Environment:
System: SunOS xayide 5.10 s10_42 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-1
Architecture: sun4
host: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
build: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
target: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
configured with: /vol/gnu/src/gcc/gcc/configure --prefix=/vol/gcc --with-local-prefix=/vol/gcc --disable-nls
How-To-Repeat:
$ touch test.c
$ ./xgcc -B./ -c -Werror-implicit-function-declaration test.c
$ ./xgcc -B./ -c -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration test.c
cc1: error: unrecognized command line option "-Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [Bug c/12951] -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized 2003-11-07 21:45 [Bug driver/12951] New: -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-08 8:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-28 9:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-08 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-08 08:17 ------- I can confirm this on the mainline (20031105) and all the way to 2.95.3. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Component|driver |c Ever Confirmed| |1 Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2003-11-08 08:17:28 date| | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12951 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/12951] -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized 2003-11-07 21:45 [Bug driver/12951] New: -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-08 8:17 ` [Bug c/12951] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-28 9:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-07 14:28 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de ` (2 subsequent siblings) 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-12-28 9:52 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-28 05:59 ------- This is a documentation problem, I think. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |documentation http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12951 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/12951] -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized 2003-11-07 21:45 [Bug driver/12951] New: -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-08 8:17 ` [Bug c/12951] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-28 9:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-01-07 14:28 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2004-09-24 23:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-24 23:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de @ 2004-01-07 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2004-01-07 14:28 ------- Subject: Re: -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized > This is a documentation problem, I think. Why? Any reason the -Wno-... form shouldn't work in this particular case? Rainer -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12951 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/12951] -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized 2003-11-07 21:45 [Bug driver/12951] New: -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2004-01-07 14:28 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de @ 2004-09-24 23:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-24 23:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-24 23:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-24 23:18 ------- Subject: Bug 12951 CVSROOT: /cvs/gcc Module name: gcc Changes by: jsm28@gcc.gnu.org 2004-09-24 23:18:03 Modified files: gcc : ChangeLog gcc/doc : invoke.texi Log message: PR c/12951 * doc/invoke.texi: Document that -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration is not accepted. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.5611&r2=2.5612 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/doc/invoke.texi.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.541&r2=1.542 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12951 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Bug c/12951] -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized 2003-11-07 21:45 [Bug driver/12951] New: -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2004-09-24 23:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-24 23:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-09-24 23:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-24 23:23 ------- Fixed. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution| |FIXED Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12951 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-09-24 23:23 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2003-11-07 21:45 [Bug driver/12951] New: -Wno-error-implicit-function-declaration not recognized gcc-bugzilla at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-11-08 8:17 ` [Bug c/12951] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-28 9:52 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-07 14:28 ` ro at techfak dot uni-bielefeld dot de 2004-09-24 23:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-24 23:23 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).