public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/12419] [3.3 Regression] Performace regression: poor optimization of const memory Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:23:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20040928132317.10543.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20030926105501.12419.aph@gcc.gnu.org> ------- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-28 13:23 ------- (In reply to comment #16) > Should be fixed on gcc-3_4-branch. (In reply to comment #16) > Should be fixed on gcc-3_4-branch. Jakub -- Do you plan to do anything for this on gcc-3_3-branch? -- Gaby -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Known to work|3.2 tree-ssa 3.2.3 3.4.0 4.0|3.2 tree-ssa 3.2.3 3.4.0 | |4.0.0 Target Milestone|3.3.5 |3.3.6 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12419
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-28 13:23 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2003-09-26 14:55 [Bug optimization/12419] New: " aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-26 14:56 ` [Bug optimization/12419] " aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-26 18:35 ` bangerth at dealii dot org 2003-09-27 8:12 ` [Bug optimization/12419] [3.3/3.4 Regression] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-29 23:07 ` janis187 at us dot ibm dot com 2003-09-29 23:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-09-30 19:39 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-10-06 8:01 ` bonzini at gnu dot org 2003-12-18 17:39 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-04 9:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-04 9:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-12 15:09 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-01-13 11:46 ` ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-16 17:33 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-01-17 8:51 ` [Bug optimization/12419] [3.3/3.4/3.5 " ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-02 2:22 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-02 10:03 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-03-02 12:16 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-04-01 17:02 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-04-05 15:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-06-11 22:21 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/12419] [3.3 " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-06 14:16 ` aph at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-28 13:23 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2004-09-28 13:36 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/12419] [3.3 Regression] Performance " jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-09-28 13:56 ` gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2004-09-28 13:57 ` gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20040928132317.10543.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).