From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-112294-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 13135 invoked by alias); 28 Sep 2004 13:56:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 13018 invoked by alias); 28 Sep 2004 13:56:11 -0000
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 13:56:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20040928135611.13017.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20030926105501.12419.aph@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <20030926105501.12419.aph@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/12419] [3.3 Regression] Performance regression: poor optimization of const memory
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg03519.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu  2004-09-28 13:56 -------
Subject: Re:  [3.3 Regression] Performance regression: poor optimization of const memory

"jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> writes:

| I think 3.3 should probably stay as is.

Good!  Let's close this bug.

-- gaby


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12419