From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16265 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2004 01:25:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 16241 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2004 01:25:29 -0000 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 01:25:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20040929012529.16240.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040918113641.17549.miguel55angel@hotmail.com> References: <20040918113641.17549.miguel55angel@hotmail.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/17549] [4.0 Regression] 25% increase in codesize (3.3.4 -> 4.0.0 20040917) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-09/txt/msg03600.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-09-29 01:25 ------- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] 25% increase in codesize (3.3.4 -> 4.0.0 20040917) rakdver at atrey dot karlin dot mff dot cuni dot cz wrote: > This patch (for quite stupid bug in ivopts) could improve the > situation a bit. I will post it once it passes regtesting. Do you have some numbers about what this patch does? Does it fix this ivopts regression, or will we need further tuning? Giovanni Bajo -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17549