* [Bug fortran/17815] Language name for --enable-languages should be "fortran" instead of "f95"
2004-10-03 19:03 [Bug fortran/17815] New: Language name for --enable-languages should be "fortran" instead of "f95" schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de
@ 2004-10-03 19:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-04 10:42 ` c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-10-03 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-03 19:07 -------
I don't think we want to change this now or ever but I could be wrong.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17815
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17815] Language name for --enable-languages should be "fortran" instead of "f95"
2004-10-03 19:03 [Bug fortran/17815] New: Language name for --enable-languages should be "fortran" instead of "f95" schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de
2004-10-03 19:07 ` [Bug fortran/17815] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-10-04 10:42 ` c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de
2004-11-20 12:16 ` toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de @ 2004-10-04 10:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de 2004-10-04 10:42 -------
(In reply to comment #1)
> I don't think we want to change this now or ever but I could be wrong.
I agree with Erik, there should only be one generic name for fortran code (as
ther is for c code). Once this
frontend is built, the different (draft) standard can be identified with the
-std=f77,f90,f90 options to adhere to a specific standard.
--enable-languages=f95 is rather misleading in this respect.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17815
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17815] Language name for --enable-languages should be "fortran" instead of "f95"
2004-10-03 19:03 [Bug fortran/17815] New: Language name for --enable-languages should be "fortran" instead of "f95" schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de
2004-10-03 19:07 ` [Bug fortran/17815] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-04 10:42 ` c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de
@ 2004-11-20 12:16 ` toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
2005-08-31 16:27 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl @ 2004-11-20 12:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2004-11-20 12:16 -------
I agree too, that's why I changed the status of this bug report to "NEW", i.e.,
confirmed :-)
Toon.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed| |1
Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-11-20 12:16:17
date| |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17815
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17815] Language name for --enable-languages should be "fortran" instead of "f95"
2004-10-03 19:03 [Bug fortran/17815] New: Language name for --enable-languages should be "fortran" instead of "f95" schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2004-11-20 12:16 ` toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl
@ 2005-08-31 16:27 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-22 22:04 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-22 22:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-08-31 16:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-31 16:24 -------
I completely agree. I would dearly love it if names like "c, c++, java, fortran"
were used consistently in naming. For directories, for configuration options,
for runtime libraries, for make check rules, etc.
Since the proposed is one small step towards sanity, I'm completely for it.
-benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17815
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17815] Language name for --enable-languages should be "fortran" instead of "f95"
2004-10-03 19:03 [Bug fortran/17815] New: Language name for --enable-languages should be "fortran" instead of "f95" schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2005-08-31 16:27 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-22 22:04 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-09-22 22:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-22 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
------- Additional Comments From tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-22 22:04 -------
Fixed by FX' recent patch.
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.0.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17815
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug fortran/17815] Language name for --enable-languages should be "fortran" instead of "f95"
2004-10-03 19:03 [Bug fortran/17815] New: Language name for --enable-languages should be "fortran" instead of "f95" schnetter at aei dot mpg dot de
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2005-09-22 22:04 ` tobi at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2005-09-22 22:19 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-09-22 22:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
--
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.0.3 |4.0.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17815
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread