From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18210 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2004 08:43:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 18156 invoked by uid 48); 4 Oct 2004 08:43:43 -0000 Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 08:43:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041004084343.18155.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "steven at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040924161937.17657.jakub@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20040924161937.17657.jakub@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/17657] [4.0 Regression] ICE in expand_case X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00391.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From steven at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-04 08:43 ------- What surprises me is that the tree that is passed to expand_case is, switch ((signed charD.9) D.1481) { case 1: goto ; case 2: goto ; case 3: goto ; case 4: goto ; case 5: goto ; case 6: goto ; case 7: goto ; case 255: goto ; default : goto ; } so somewhere we decided to replace the int t1 with a signed char case condition, and yes, 255 doesn't fit in a signed char so this replacement doesn't look right either. Hmm... -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|steven at gcc dot gnu dot | |org | AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |steven at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17657