From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21210 invoked by alias); 4 Oct 2004 10:42:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21201 invoked by uid 48); 4 Oct 2004 10:42:50 -0000 Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 10:42:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041004104250.21200.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041003190355.17815.schnetter@aei.mpg.de> References: <20041003190355.17815.schnetter@aei.mpg.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/17815] Language name for --enable-languages should be "fortran" instead of "f95" X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00406.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From c dot lemmen at fz-juelich dot de 2004-10-04 10:42 ------- (In reply to comment #1) > I don't think we want to change this now or ever but I could be wrong. I agree with Erik, there should only be one generic name for fortran code (as ther is for c code). Once this frontend is built, the different (draft) standard can be identified with the -std=f77,f90,f90 options to adhere to a specific standard. --enable-languages=f95 is rather misleading in this respect. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17815