From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-113371-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 4787 invoked by alias); 6 Oct 2004 19:22:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 4780 invoked by uid 48); 6 Oct 2004 19:22:11 -0000
Date: Wed, 06 Oct 2004 19:22:00 -0000
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20041006192210.17868.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/17868] New: [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] RDIV_EXPR not supported by dump_expr
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00758.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

Compiling the following testcase with -pedantic, I get a hosed error message
with gcc 3.4.2:

=============================
struct A
{
    A(double);
};

const A& foo();

void bar(double x)
{
    foo()=A(x/2);
}
=============================

bug.cc: In function `void bar(double)':
bug.cc:10: error: no match for 'operator=' in 'foo() = A(#`rdiv_expr' not
supported by dump_expr#<expression error>)'
bug.cc:2: note: candidates are: A& A::operator=(const A&) <near match>

I have a fix for this. Will post patch soon.

Just for the record: the error message on mainline has another problem,
see PR 17867.

-- 
           Summary: [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] RDIV_EXPR not supported by
                    dump_expr
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4.2
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: diagnostic
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17868