From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28755 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2004 00:05:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28735 invoked by uid 48); 7 Oct 2004 00:05:26 -0000 Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 00:05:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041007000526.28734.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040830055803.17237.dann@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> References: <20040830055803.17237.dann@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/17237] inefficient parameter passing on x86 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00806.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From dann at godzilla dot ics dot uci dot edu 2004-10-07 00:05 ------- With a 1 week old mainline I get: LLD: subl $12, %esp pushl 28(%esp) pushl 28(%esp) pushl 28(%esp) pushl 28(%esp) call __udivdi3 addl $28, %esp ret i.e. better than before, but the "subl" instruction is not needed. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17237