From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19048 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2004 00:26:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19028 invoked by uid 48); 7 Oct 2004 00:26:01 -0000 Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 00:26:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041007002601.19027.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20040830055803.17237.dann@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> References: <20040830055803.17237.dann@godzilla.ics.uci.edu> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/17237] inefficient parameter passing on x86 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00812.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-07 00:26 ------- OK, let's keep this bug for the additional subl instruction. Not a regression though. RTH, any idea how the subl instruction appears? Is this a generic problem, or x86 specific? -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org Severity|normal |enhancement Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED Keywords| |missed-optimization Known to fail| |2.95 3.4.3 4.0.0 Resolution|WORKSFORME | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17237