From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11417 invoked by alias); 7 Oct 2004 01:11:43 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 11394 invoked by uid 48); 7 Oct 2004 01:11:42 -0000 Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 01:11:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041007011142.11393.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "csm at gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041004233649.17831.csm@gnu.org> References: <20041004233649.17831.csm@gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug java/17831] GCJ/CNI should be usable without 'gcjh' X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg00826.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From csm at gnu dot org 2004-10-07 01:11 ------- Yes, but gcj doesn't have this feature currently, and gcjh only works with bytecode. In the least it should work with java source, too. In my opinion being able to generate CNI headers along with the compilation step would be invaluable in itself. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17831