From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-113774-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 9446 invoked by alias); 9 Oct 2004 05:04:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 9429 invoked by uid 48); 9 Oct 2004 05:03:59 -0000
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 05:04:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20041009050359.9428.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20040629130803.16266.amylaar@gcc.gnu.org>
References: <20040629130803.16266.amylaar@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/16266] [4.0 regression] gcc.dg/c99-intconst-1.c compilation is very slow
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg01161.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-10-09 05:03 -------
The right patch is posted here: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg00808.html> 
unlike the one posted in the PR, this one actually works.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |patch


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16266