From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25101 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2004 16:14:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 25074 invoked by alias); 10 Oct 2004 16:14:50 -0000 Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 16:14:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041010161450.25073.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041010085558.17920.mutz@kde.org> References: <20041010085558.17920.mutz@kde.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/17920] add __attribute__((reimpl)) as a replacement for the (optional) virtual keyword for reimplementations of virtual functions X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg01300.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2004-10-10 16:14 ------- Subject: Re: add __attribute__((reimpl)) as a replacement for the (optional) virtual keyword for reimplementations of virtual functions "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" writes: | I don't think we want an extension like this unless it is drafted to | the C++ committee. For the record, that usually surfaces as "override" keyword in recurrent discussions. The debates date back to the earlier days when virtual was introduced in C++. Nothing has ever happened. I don't think I'm in favor of this PR. -- Gaby -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17920