public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bruno at clisp dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/6585] Redundant store/load instruction pairs on ix86
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 11:55:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041011115528.30147.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020506130600.6585.bruno@clisp.org>


------- Additional Comments From bruno at clisp dot org  2004-10-11 11:55 -------
This result is even better: shorter than the previous ones, and there are 
no useless moves between registers any more. 
 
However, there are more useless moves from register to stack slot and back 
from stack slot to register. They could be eliminated. 
 
Commented listing: 
 
mul: 
        subl    $20, %esp 
        movl    32(%esp), %ecx		b0 
        movl    24(%esp), %eax		a0 
        movl    %ebx, 8(%esp)				; save %ebx 
        movl    36(%esp), %ebx		b1 
        movl    %edi, 12(%esp)				; save %edi 
        movl    24(%esp), %edi		a0 
        movl    %ebp, 16(%esp)				; save %ebp 
        mull    %ecx			%edx:%eax := a0*b0 
        imull   28(%esp), %ecx		a1*b0 
        imull   %ebx, %edi		a0*b1 
        movl    8(%esp), %ebx				; restore %ebx 
        movl    %edx, %ebp		hi 
        movl    %eax, (%esp)				USELESS! 
        addl    %edi, %ebp		hi+a0*b1 
        movl    (%esp), %eax				USELESS! 
        leal    (%ebp,%ecx), %ecx	hi+a0*b1+a1*b0	COULD GO INTO %edx 
DIRECTLY 
        movl    12(%esp), %edi				; restore %edi 
        movl    %ecx, 4(%esp)				USELESS! 
        movl    16(%esp), %ebp				; restore %ebp 
        movl    4(%esp), %edx				USELESS! 
        addl    $20, %esp 
        ret 
 

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6585


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-10-11 11:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20020506130600.6585.bruno@clisp.org>
2003-07-04 11:09 ` [Bug optimization/6585] useless memory store instructions on x86 steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-07-10 20:09 ` [Bug optimization/6585] Reduntant store/load instruction pairs on ix86 steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-08-23  1:38 ` [Bug optimization/6585] Redundant " dhazeghi at yahoo dot com
2003-11-25  7:51 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-03-17  8:03 ` kazu at cs dot umass dot edu
2004-03-17 12:10 ` bruno at clisp dot org
2004-10-11  2:57 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/6585] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-11 11:55 ` bruno at clisp dot org [this message]
2005-06-26 13:35 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-06-27 11:50 ` bruno at clisp dot org
     [not found] <bug-6585-128@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2007-11-23  6:02 ` ismail at pardus dot org dot tr
2007-11-23  7:37 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-23  7:43 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com
2007-11-23 20:43 ` rask at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-11-23 20:48 ` steven at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-12-19 14:15 ` rask at gcc dot gnu dot org
2008-09-06 16:19 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041011115528.30147.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).