From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19468 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2004 20:49:05 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 19447 invoked by uid 48); 11 Oct 2004 20:49:05 -0000 Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 20:49:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041011204905.19446.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041010135516.17922.jm@bourguet.org> References: <20041010135516.17922.jm@bourguet.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug libstdc++/17922] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] Spurious warnings about std::ios_base::seekdir X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg01496.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-11 20:49 ------- could add enum _Ios_Seekdir { _S_ios_seekdir_beg = 0, _S_ios_seekdir_cur = 1, _S_ios_seekdir_end = 2 _S_ios_seekdir_final = 1L << 16 }; This would change the value of (the currently unfortunately named) _S_ios_seekdir_end, but since this is an implementation feature I think it'd be ok. Most importantly, the type size would be the same. We should add compile-only testsuite regressions for this. -benjamin -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17922