public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/17967] [4.0 Regression] Expand is considered slower? (or is it because gimplifier considered part of expand) Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 04:03:00 -0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20041013040259.31604.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20041013035800.17967.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-13 04:02 ------- 4.0.0: Execution times (seconds) preprocessing : 0.06 ( 0%) usr 0.12 (17%) sys 0.16 ( 1%) wall lexical analysis : 0.12 ( 1%) usr 0.23 (32%) sys 0.47 ( 3%) wall parser : 0.14 ( 1%) usr 0.15 (21%) sys 0.23 ( 1%) wall tree gimplify : 0.04 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.04 ( 0%) wall tree eh : 0.02 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.02 ( 0%) wall tree CFG construction : 0.04 ( 0%) usr 0.01 ( 1%) sys 0.06 ( 0%) wall tree CFG cleanup : 0.09 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.10 ( 1%) wall tree PTA : 0.01 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 0%) wall tree PHI insertion : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 0%) wall tree SSA rewrite : 0.02 ( 0%) usr 0.01 ( 1%) sys 0.03 ( 0%) wall tree SSA other : 0.06 ( 0%) usr 0.07 (10%) sys 0.16 ( 1%) wall tree operand scan : 0.04 ( 0%) usr 0.07 (10%) sys 0.10 ( 1%) wall dominator optimization: 0.08 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.08 ( 1%) wall tree conservative DCE : 0.01 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 0%) wall tree rename SSA copies: 0.01 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall dominance frontiers : 0.02 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 0%) wall expand : 13.82 (95%) usr 0.04 ( 6%) sys 14.35 (90%) wall global alloc : 0.01 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall symout : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.01 ( 0%) wall TOTAL : 14.60 0.71 15.95 3.3: Execution times (seconds) cfg construction : 0.09 ( 2%) usr 0.01 ( 2%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall cfg cleanup : 3.47 (79%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 2.00 (50%) wall trivially dead code : 0.07 ( 2%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall preprocessing : 0.04 ( 1%) usr 0.12 (22%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall lexical analysis : 0.17 ( 4%) usr 0.19 (35%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall parser : 0.08 ( 2%) usr 0.16 (29%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall expand : 0.04 ( 1%) usr 0.01 ( 2%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall integration : 0.01 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall jump : 0.08 ( 2%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall CSE : 0.15 ( 3%) usr 0.03 ( 5%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall branch prediction : 0.11 ( 3%) usr 0.01 ( 2%) sys 2.00 (50%) wall local alloc : 0.01 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall global alloc : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.01 ( 2%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall flow 2 : 0.01 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall rest of compilation : 0.05 ( 1%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall TOTAL : 4.39 0.55 4.00 remove_useless_stmts is counted in expand. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17967
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-13 4:03 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2004-10-13 3:58 [Bug middle-end/17967] New: " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-13 3:58 ` [Bug middle-end/17967] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-13 4:03 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org [this message] 2004-10-13 12:34 ` [Bug middle-end/17967] [4.0 Regression] Expand is considered slower? (remove_useless_stmts is " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-13 20:26 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-13 20:33 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-14 14:07 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-14 14:56 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-14 18:38 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-14 21:59 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-14 22:00 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-15 4:17 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-15 4:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-17 22:55 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-18 18:31 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 19:16 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-23 19:17 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20041013040259.31604.qmail@sourceware.org \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).