From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-114322-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 17826 invoked by alias); 13 Oct 2004 09:38:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 17815 invoked by uid 48); 13 Oct 2004 09:38:32 -0000
Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2004 09:38:00 -0000
From: "reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Message-ID: <20041013093830.17971.reichelt@gcc.gnu.org>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/17971] New: [3.4/4.0 regression] Invalid default parameter not diagnosed.
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg01709.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

Since PR 16929 got a little confusing, I'm opening a new PR for the
following problem:

Since gcc 3.4.0 we accept the following invalid code snippet. The invalid
default parameter "a" is not even diagnosed at instantiation time.
(This is different from PT 17011 - also a spin-off from PR16929 -
which is just a QoI issue.)

===========================================
template<typename> struct A {};

template<typename T> struct B
{
    A<T> a;

    void foo(A<T> = a);
};

template struct B<int>;
===========================================

With 3.3.5 and before we got a decent error message:
bug.cc:7: error: invalid use of member `B<T>::a'

-- 
           Summary: [3.4/4.0 regression] Invalid default parameter not
                    diagnosed.
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4.3
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: accepts-invalid
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: c++
        AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: reichelt at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,mark at codesourcery dot
                    com


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17971