From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26481 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2004 00:34:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 26465 invoked by alias); 14 Oct 2004 00:34:58 -0000 Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2004 00:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041014003458.26464.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "mostrows at watson dot ibm dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041013124723.17972.mostrows@watson.ibm.com> References: <20041013124723.17972.mostrows@watson.ibm.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug rtl-optimization/17972] [3.4 Regression] const/pure functions result in bad asm X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg01862.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From mostrows at watson dot ibm dot com 2004-10-14 00:34 ------- Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] const/pure functions result in bad asm Well, it requires -O1, to address your earlier comment. I'm using the 3.4.2 tar archive: 2fada3a3effd2fd791df09df1f1534b3 /home/mostrows/downloads/gcc-3.4.2.tar.bz2 Here's the config info: mostrows@heater:~/tools.k42/powerpc/partDeb/os$ powerpc64-linux-gcc -v Reading specs from /opt/crosstool/powerpc64-linux/gcc-3.4.2- glibc-2.3.3/lib/gcc/powerpc64-linux/3.4.2/specs Configured with: /home/mostrows/tools/crosstool-0.28- rc37/build/powerpc64-linux/gcc-3.4.2-glibc-2.3.3/gcc-3.4.2/configure -- target=powerpc64-linux --host=powerpc64-host_unknown-linux-gnu -- prefix=/opt/crosstool/powerpc64-linux/gcc-3.4.2-glibc-2.3.3 --disable- multilib --with-sysroot=/opt/crosstool/powerpc64-linux/gcc-3.4.2- glibc-2.3.3/powerpc64-linux/sys-root --with-local- prefix=/opt/crosstool/powerpc64-linux/gcc-3.4.2-glibc-2.3.3/powerpc64- linux/sys-root --disable-nls --enable-threads=posix --enable-symvers=gnu --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-shared --enable- c99 --enable-long-long Thread model: posix gcc version 3.4.2 On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 00:03 +0000, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: > ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-14 00:03 ------- > Also with a newest compiler (todays) I cannot reproduce this. What compiler are you starting with and is > this with a bootstrap or a cross compiler? > -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17972