From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4015 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2004 04:18:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 3792 invoked by uid 48); 15 Oct 2004 04:17:33 -0000 Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 04:18:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041015041733.3791.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041013035800.17967.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20041013035800.17967.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/17967] [4.0 Regression] Expand is considered slower? (remove_useless_stmts is considered part of expand) X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg02032.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-15 04:17 ------- The patch had to be reverted as it caused some missed-optimization regressions. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17967