From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2533 invoked by alias); 15 Oct 2004 23:12:22 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 2526 invoked by uid 48); 15 Oct 2004 23:12:21 -0000 Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:12:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041015231221.2525.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041013124723.17972.mostrows@watson.ibm.com> References: <20041013124723.17972.mostrows@watson.ibm.com> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/17972] [3.4 Regression] const/pure functions result in bad asm X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg02193.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-15 23:12 ------- Never mind you are right Alan, I do need to use cc1plus but why. The RTL is wrong already at .01.rtl. So this is 3.4 regression (it might be a 3.3 regression also I don't know). But this was fixed on the mainline. Why this does not effect any other target I don't know. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Component|rtl-optimization |c++ Summary|[3.3 Regression] const/pure |[3.4 Regression] const/pure |functions result in bad asm |functions result in bad asm Target Milestone|--- |3.4.3 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17972