From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9173 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2004 03:09:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 9147 invoked by uid 48); 16 Oct 2004 03:09:18 -0000 Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 03:09:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041016030918.9146.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041002054828.17793.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20041002054828.17793.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug ada/17793] [4.0 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg02211.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-16 03:09 ------- No this is an Ada front-end problem. I think the main issue is that the tree-ssa expects that INTEGER types are close to the same and that pointers to them are compatible if the types are them selves compatible so maybe the Ada front-end should be producing types which are like that. Really if types are compatiable so should be the pointers to them. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |org |dot org Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Component|middle-end |ada http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17793