From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21050 invoked by alias); 16 Oct 2004 09:02:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21037 invoked by uid 48); 16 Oct 2004 09:02:13 -0000 Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2004 09:02:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041016090213.21035.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041002054828.17793.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20041002054828.17793.pinskia@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/17793] [4.0 Regression] Ada bootstrap failure X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg02222.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-16 09:02 ------- > No this is an Ada front-end problem. Did you investigate? > I think the main issue is that the tree-ssa expects that INTEGER types are > close to the same and that pointers to them are compatible if the types are > themselves compatible so maybe the Ada front-end should be producing types > which are like that. Really if types are compatiable so should be the > pointers to them. Did you read what I wrote? The types are not compatible so the Ada front-end correctly puts a NOP_EXPR between them. But the gimplifier decides to strip it and later thinks it should not have done so. And, please, don't unassign PRs without discussing with the assignee beforehand. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot |dot org |org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Component|ada |middle-end http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17793