From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31049 invoked by alias); 17 Oct 2004 13:34:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 31038 invoked by uid 48); 17 Oct 2004 13:34:56 -0000 Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:34:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041017133456.31037.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "giovannibajo at libero dot it" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041017123619.18040.aj@gcc.gnu.org> References: <20041017123619.18040.aj@gcc.gnu.org> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/18040] [4.0 Regression] ICE in for_each_index, at tree-ssa-loop-im.c:178 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg02301.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2004-10-17 13:34 ------- Kazu, make sure the fill the missing fields when confirming a bug. Especially the regression status is very important. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |critical Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code Known to fail| |4.0.0 Known to work| |3.4.2 Summary|ICE in for_each_index, at |[4.0 Regression] ICE in |tree-ssa-loop-im.c:178 |for_each_index, at tree-ssa- | |loop-im.c:178 Target Milestone|--- |4.0.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18040