public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "bkoz at redhat dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/17743] dependent expressions in attributes
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 05:23:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041018052346.10669.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040930042632.17743.bkoz@gcc.gnu.org>
------- Additional Comments From bkoz at redhat dot com 2004-10-18 05:23 -------
Subject: Re: dependent expressions in attributes
>Is this a showstopper for tr1 work?
Not that I can see. From what I can tell, tr1::array is going to require
default-constructable types.
I think the library hackers are interested in this kind of stuff for our
own selfish reasons.
I guess I don't see why/how alignof should be different than sizeof
here (which works):
template <class T>
struct A
{
char foo[sizeof(T)];
};
-benjamin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17743
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-18 5:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-30 4:26 [Bug c++/17743] New: __alignof__ vs. typedefs bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-30 4:28 ` [Bug c++/17743] " bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-30 4:29 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-30 4:30 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-30 4:33 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-30 4:33 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-30 4:45 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-30 4:47 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-09-30 11:12 ` gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu
2004-09-30 12:27 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-09-30 14:48 ` bkoz at redhat dot com
2004-10-15 1:49 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-10-16 2:00 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-10-16 3:37 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2004-10-16 13:52 ` bkoz at redhat dot com
2004-10-17 4:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-17 4:48 ` [Bug c++/17743] dependent expressions in attributes giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-10-17 7:50 ` gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu
2004-10-18 3:51 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-10-18 5:23 ` bkoz at redhat dot com [this message]
2004-10-18 16:38 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
2004-10-18 18:57 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-19 6:23 ` bkoz at redhat dot com
2004-10-27 17:19 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-28 3:38 ` giovannibajo at libero dot it
[not found] <bug-17743-365@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2005-10-05 21:03 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-05 21:06 ` bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-05 21:16 ` rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-10-05 22:34 ` mark at codesourcery dot com
2007-09-22 14:29 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-22 14:30 ` jason at gcc dot gnu dot org
2007-09-25 21:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041018052346.10669.qmail@sourceware.org \
--to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
--cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).