From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-115065-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 10477 invoked by alias); 18 Oct 2004 22:35:03 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 10470 invoked by uid 48); 18 Oct 2004 22:35:02 -0000
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:35:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20041018223502.10469.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20041018215708.18050.mitr@volny.cz>
References: <20041018215708.18050.mitr@volny.cz>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c/18050] -Wsequence-point reports false positives
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg02452.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-10-18 22:35 -------
We cannot just ignore ADDR_EXPR outright though (this is undefined):
struct x
{
  int i;
};
void g(struct x*, int *);
void f(struct x *y)
{
  g(y++, &y->i);
}

I think I have a fix will test the fix.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu   |pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |dot org                     |org
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18050