From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28601 invoked by alias); 19 Oct 2004 18:54:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 28594 invoked by uid 48); 19 Oct 2004 18:54:47 -0000 Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 18:54:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041019185447.28593.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "coyote at coyotegulch dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20041009161912.17912.anlauf@hep.tu-darmstadt.de> References: <20041009161912.17912.anlauf@hep.tu-darmstadt.de> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/17912] gfortran: Bogus "Arithmetic overflow" error, regression w.r.t. g77 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg02538.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From coyote at coyotegulch dot com 2004-10-19 18:54 ------- I've posted an update to the original "asymmetric integers" patch, but it did not address this specific PR. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17912