public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/18065] usual arithmetic conversion not applying correctly
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 22:42:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041020224159.24854.qmail@sourceware.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041019202143.18065.schlie@comcast.net>


------- Additional Comments From jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk  2004-10-20 22:41 -------
Subject: Re:  usual arithmetic conversion not applying correctly

On Wed, 20 Oct 2004, schlie at comcast dot net wrote:

>  It's a pretty major screw-up to presume
>  all target machines are large, and then to encode that presumption into
>  C's front end; not to mention it seems pretty stupid to do, and then

This is not a GCC presumption, it is a property of the C language that 
there are certain promotions that may not be optimally efficient for 8-bit 
targets.  If there is a "major screw-up", it is either in the choice to 
use a language designed for systems that are at least 16-bit on an 8-bit 
target, or in the language design if you think 8-bit targets should have 
been given greater importance when the language was being standardised in 
the 1980s; it is nothing to do with the front end.  The AVR target has a 
-mint8 option which puts the compiler in a nonconforming mode with 8-bit 
int, which might however give you better code than you can get with 
standard C on an 8-bit target.



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18065


  parent reply	other threads:[~2004-10-20 22:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-10-19 20:22 [Bug c/18065] New: wrong built-in functions selected schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-19 20:27 ` [Bug c/18065] " schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-19 20:39 ` [Bug target/18065] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-19 21:18 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-19 21:31 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-19 21:39 ` [Bug target/18065] not using qi version of divmod pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-19 21:53 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-19 22:08 ` ericw at evcohs dot com
2004-10-19 22:31 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-19 23:13 ` ericw at evcohs dot com
2004-10-20 18:34 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-20 18:50 ` [Bug c/18065] usual arithmetic conversion not applying correctly pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-20 19:14 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-20 19:18 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-20 19:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-20 19:29 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-20 19:33 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-20 19:54 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-20 21:19 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-20 21:25 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-20 21:31 ` jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
2004-10-20 21:46 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-20 22:27 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-20 22:31 ` [Bug tree-optimization/18065] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-10-20 22:42 ` jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk [this message]
2004-10-20 23:03 ` jsm at polyomino dot org dot uk
2004-10-20 23:28 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-21  1:04 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-21  1:28 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2004-10-21 12:47 ` bangerth at dealii dot org
2004-12-21 20:50 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2005-01-16  1:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2005-01-16  7:17 ` schlie at comcast dot net
2005-01-16 17:39 ` schlie at comcast dot net
     [not found] <bug-18065-9497@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2010-09-14  7:06 ` abnikant dot singh at atmel dot com
2010-09-14  7:13 ` abnikant dot singh at atmel dot com
     [not found] <bug-18065-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2012-05-24 14:03 ` peter777778 at hotmail dot co.uk
2012-05-24 14:04 ` peter777778 at hotmail dot co.uk
2012-05-24 14:05 ` peter777778 at hotmail dot co.uk
2012-05-24 14:23 ` peter777778 at hotmail dot co.uk

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20041020224159.24854.qmail@sourceware.org \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).