From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21271 invoked by alias); 25 Oct 2004 02:21:20 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org Received: (qmail 21078 invoked by uid 48); 25 Oct 2004 02:21:19 -0000 Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 02:21:00 -0000 Message-ID: <20041025022119.21073.qmail@sourceware.org> From: "geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <20020212134602.5675.jsm-gccbugs@polyomino.org.uk> References: <20020212134602.5675.jsm-gccbugs@polyomino.org.uk> Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/5675] [4.0 regression] const variables wrongly considered part of constant expressions X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg03020.txt.bz2 List-Id: ------- Additional Comments From geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-25 02:21 ------- GCC is now more consistent about when this bug triggers, so some cases which passed in 3.4 fail in 4.0. There are testcases for this bug, gcc.dg/c90-const-expr-3.c and gcc.dg/c99-const-expr-3.c. -- What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed|2004-02-16 04:46:57 |2004-10-25 02:21:16 date| | Summary|const variables wrongly |[4.0 regression] const |considered part of constant |variables wrongly considered |expressions |part of constant expressions http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5675