From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-115769-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: (qmail 28626 invoked by alias); 26 Oct 2004 08:31:02 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 28604 invoked by uid 48); 26 Oct 2004 08:30:58 -0000
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:31:00 -0000
Message-ID: <20041026083058.28603.qmail@sourceware.org>
From: "ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
In-Reply-To: <20040427165935.15172.michael.spencer@ubs.com>
References: <20040427165935.15172.michael.spencer@ubs.com>
Reply-To: gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/15172] [3.3/3.4 regression] Copy constructor optimization in aggregate initialization
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-SW-Source: 2004-10/txt/msg03156.txt.bz2
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>


------- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-10-26 08:30 -------
Is this problem specific to SPARC?  If no, I'd suggest to change the triplets.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot
                   |                            |org


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15172